[Evolution] Address Harvesting

Matthew A. R. Sherian mars@mars-tmc.hq.themunicenter.com
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 22:03:07 -0400


--=-mEhnmIl+sErUIFUGtPQ7
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 10:49, Eric Lambart wrote:

> On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 18:47, William A. Yohman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 05:20, Eric Lambart wrote:
> > > Since it is archived by google and mail-archive.com and probably
> > > accessible in other public places, probably not.
> > > 
> > > ...unless you're asking for the email addresses to be somehow
> > > obfuscated.  That could certainly come in handy, it would stop me from
> > > getting two copies of every message when someone replies using "Reply to
> > > All" instead of "Reply to List" (@#$#@$@#!)

We need a KB-shortcut for Reply to list :) 

> > > 
> > > Eric
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:34, Bill Yohman wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to configure this list (HINT HINT) so that I don't get my 
> > > > e-mail address harvested?
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers.
> > > > 
> > 
> > I also run a mailing list but I don't allow the addresses to be archived
> > as that's a basic no-no, IMHO. Surely mailman can be configured to
> > remove e-mail addresses from the archives?
> 
> When I think about it, it certainly should be possible, and if so I
> can't imagine why they're doing it.  I use different email addresses for
> various mailing lists, and this one gets the most spam by far.  Love
> those Microsoft Support offers I've been getting lately.
> 
> Eric

--=-mEhnmIl+sErUIFUGtPQ7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.8">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 10:49, Eric Lambart wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 18:47, William A. Yohman wrote:
&gt; On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 05:20, Eric Lambart wrote:
&gt; &gt; Since it is archived by google and mail-archive.com and probably
&gt; &gt; accessible in other public places, probably not.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; ...unless you're asking for the email addresses to be somehow
&gt; &gt; obfuscated.  That could certainly come in handy, it would stop me from
&gt; &gt; getting two copies of every message when someone replies using &quot;Reply to
&gt; &gt; All&quot; instead of &quot;Reply to List&quot; (@#$#@$@#!)</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
We need a KB-shortcut for Reply to list :) 
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; Eric
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:34, Bill Yohman wrote:
&gt; &gt; &gt; Is it possible to configure this list (HINT HINT) so that I don't get my 
&gt; &gt; &gt; e-mail address harvested?
&gt; &gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; Cheers.
&gt; &gt; &gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; I also run a mailing list but I don't allow the addresses to be archived
&gt; as that's a basic no-no, IMHO. Surely mailman can be configured to
&gt; remove e-mail addresses from the archives?

When I think about it, it certainly should be possible, and if so I
can't imagine why they're doing it.  I use different email addresses for
various mailing lists, and this one gets the most spam by far.  Love
those Microsoft Support offers I've been getting lately.

Eric</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-mEhnmIl+sErUIFUGtPQ7--