From murrayc at murrayc.com  Thu Jul  3 10:28:41 2008
From: murrayc at murrayc.com (Murray Cumming)
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:28:41 +0200
Subject: [Glade-devel] EggToolPallete in Glade?
Message-ID: <1215095321.7917.48.camel@murrayc-desktop>

Mathias Hasselmann and Jan Arne Petersen have recently been working on a
tool palette widget, aiming to get it into a future version of GTK+. We
use it in the unstable branch of Glom. It was originally based on the
Glade tool palette, so you seem like ideal candidate to try to use it.
That would maybe give it enough testing to get into GTK+.
?
There's an old screencast here:
http://taschenorakel.de/media/movies/egg-tool-palette.ogg
and a screenshot:
http://taschenorakel.de/pictures/screenshots/2008/03/31/testtoolpalette.png
These are of the example that is in libegg.

And Jan Arne Petersen did some bugfixing recently (with screenshots):
http://blog.jpetersen.org/2008/06/01/openismus-clutter-tutorial-and-tool-palette/

-- 
murrayc at murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com


From tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com  Thu Jul  3 13:45:19 2008
From: tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com (Tristan Van Berkom)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:45:19 -0400
Subject: [Glade-devel] EggToolPallete in Glade?
In-Reply-To: <1215095321.7917.48.camel@murrayc-desktop>
References: <1215095321.7917.48.camel@murrayc-desktop>
Message-ID: <560259cb0807031045j4860b280vf2495ee01d203944@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Murray Cumming <murrayc at murrayc.com> wrote:
> Mathias Hasselmann and Jan Arne Petersen have recently been working on a
> tool palette widget, aiming to get it into a future version of GTK+. We
> use it in the unstable branch of Glom. It was originally based on the
> Glade tool palette, so you seem like ideal candidate to try to use it.
> That would maybe give it enough testing to get into GTK+.

Sounds good, I'll be happy to review patches to that effect, although
I wonder, you propose to add it in a branch ? can we depend on libegg
(i.e. is libegg in gnome releases ?)

glade requires right now that the palette allow us to iterate through the
palette items to set their tooltips and sensitive state (in
gtkbuillder situations,
deprecated widgets are disabled), we also have those different text/icon
viewing modes...

Cheers,
                         -Tristan

From murrayc at murrayc.com  Thu Jul  3 14:03:03 2008
From: murrayc at murrayc.com (Murray Cumming)
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:03:03 +0200
Subject: [Glade-devel] EggToolPallete in Glade?
In-Reply-To: <560259cb0807031045j4860b280vf2495ee01d203944@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1215095321.7917.48.camel@murrayc-desktop>
	<560259cb0807031045j4860b280vf2495ee01d203944@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1215108183.7917.65.camel@murrayc-desktop>

On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:45 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Murray Cumming <murrayc at murrayc.com> wrote:
> > Mathias Hasselmann and Jan Arne Petersen have recently been working on a
> > tool palette widget, aiming to get it into a future version of GTK+. We
> > use it in the unstable branch of Glom. It was originally based on the
> > Glade tool palette, so you seem like ideal candidate to try to use it.
> > That would maybe give it enough testing to get into GTK+.
> 
> Sounds good, I'll be happy to review patches to that effect, although
> I wonder, you propose to add it in a branch ?

Maybe. I'd like to avoid doing this work myself. Sorry, I'm just short
on time.

>  can we depend on libegg
> (i.e. is libegg in gnome releases ?)

The idea of libegg is that you copy the files into your own project, and
keep copying them when they are improved in libegg. libegg is never
installed so it can't be a normal dependency.

> glade requires right now that the palette allow us to iterate through the
> palette items to set their tooltips and sensitive state (in
> gtkbuillder situations,

I guess that's possible already. It's derived from GtkContainer.

> deprecated widgets are disabled), we also have those different text/icon
> viewing modes...

Yeah, EggToolPalette supports that via the GtkToolShell interface:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/GtkToolShell.html

Remember, we based it on your tool palette because it seemed like the
most sane one, which was already fairly generically coded.

-- 
murrayc at murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com


From tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com  Thu Jul  3 14:49:13 2008
From: tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com (Tristan Van Berkom)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:49:13 -0400
Subject: [Glade-devel] EggToolPallete in Glade?
In-Reply-To: <1215108183.7917.65.camel@murrayc-desktop>
References: <1215095321.7917.48.camel@murrayc-desktop>
	<560259cb0807031045j4860b280vf2495ee01d203944@mail.gmail.com>
	<1215108183.7917.65.camel@murrayc-desktop>
Message-ID: <560259cb0807031149l14d5538h82d1154eefa0a3ec@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Murray Cumming <murrayc at murrayc.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:45 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Murray Cumming <murrayc at murrayc.com> wrote:
>> > Mathias Hasselmann and Jan Arne Petersen have recently been working on a
>> > tool palette widget, aiming to get it into a future version of GTK+. We
>> > use it in the unstable branch of Glom. It was originally based on the
>> > Glade tool palette, so you seem like ideal candidate to try to use it.
>> > That would maybe give it enough testing to get into GTK+.
>>
>> Sounds good, I'll be happy to review patches to that effect, although
>> I wonder, you propose to add it in a branch ?
>
> Maybe. I'd like to avoid doing this work myself. Sorry, I'm just short
> on time.

ditto :)

I will already be impressed if we make glade 3.6 for the next stable gnome.

Cheers,
                  -Tristan

From tvb at gnome.org  Mon Jul  7 01:03:01 2008
From: tvb at gnome.org (Tristan Van Berkom)
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 01:03:01 -0400
Subject: [Glade-devel] Patches!
In-Reply-To: <1215378112.12038.23.camel@idefix>
References: <1215378112.12038.23.camel@idefix>
Message-ID: <560259cb0807062203t126fc1e9q3592a30afa418b6@mail.gmail.com>

Ok I'll get on it soon, I have a big pending patch I need to
finish/tidy up and then
I'll go through all the patches and make some releases.

Cheers,
                 -Tristan


On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Johannes Schmid <jhs at jsschmid.de> wrote:
> Hi Tristan!
>
> My Soc-Student (Pavel Kostyuchenko) file a number of patches in bugzilla
> but most were left completely without comment. Most of them a rather
> simple bug fixes and I would be happy if they would be applied.
>
> He also filed some patches about anjuta integration but I really need
> your comments because I don't know much about glade3 internals.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Johannes
>