[Mono-list] ".NET 3.0" misnomer
Miguel de Icaza
miguel at ximian.com
Sun Aug 13 17:52:13 EDT 2006
> Now the problem is this: if nearly all of .NET 2.0 is portable, and none of
> NET 3.0 is portable, and .NET 3.5 will have crucial changes like LinQ,
> there's no guarantee that .NET 3.5 onward won't depend on .NET 3.0,
> therefore making .NET unportable.
I have not seen anything in .NET 3.0 which is inherently difficult to
implement on Unix.
If you could point out something that you think is fundamentally
unimplementable, we could have a discussion about that feature.
More information about the Mono-list